We’ve talked a lot over the past few weeks about #gamergate, Anita Sarkeesian, and Zoe Quinn. Recently, they were accused of lying about the threats they were receiving, and of course we have all been accused of trying to kill the entire gaming industry. Zoe and Anita have had to deal with a very public mess of threats, and rather than take that seriously, people still want to stick their heads in the sand and say it’s not really happening.
This week, Emma Watson gave a speech about feminism to the UN. I thought it was a pretty good speech. She said she decided she was a feminist and that seemed “uncomplicated” to her. In the same sense, I found her speech pretty uncomplicated. She was asking for equal rights after all. That’s what we want. As far as I can tell, she’s not connected to the gaming industry, but our goals are similar, even though our goals include equal representation in video games. But, then she was threatened with the exposure of nude photos. I want to say, of course she was threatened with the exposure of nude photos, but I can’t because I was honestly surprised by these threats. Even though this now appears to have been a PR stunt, I’m still disturbed that there are people out there whose minds work this way. And, that’s scary.
I have no idea why I was surprised. I see this everyday. Whether it’s high profile or everyday interaction in real life or through internet comments, women are constantly dismissed or threatened whether they say something or not. But, I don’t get the anger over Emma Watson’s speech. If women are paid equal to men, will that mean men make less? (Probably not, given I wrote “equal”). If women can walk down the street unafraid, does that mean men have to be afraid? I mean, come on. What is so threatening about the equality of women?
Emma Watson spent some time trying to move perception of the word “feminist” away from the negative stereotype. The negative stereotype of feminazi, man-hating bitch exists, but that’s not what feminism is about. I see this definition coming out in some of the responses in this Time article quoting celebrities on the issue of feminism, and I find some of the quotes disappointing. Buried within some of the disappointing “I’m not a feminist” responses, such as Shailene Woodley’s, I see the tension between the negative stereotype with the goals of feminism:
“No, because I love men, and I think the idea of ‘raise women to power, take the men away from the power’ is never going to work out because you need balance…My biggest thing is really sisterhood more than feminism.”
I could change that to “yes, I’m a feminist because I love men, and I think the idea of ‘raise women to power, take the men away from power’ is ridiculous because you need balance.” For me, feminism has nothing to do with taking anything away from men, and everything to do with equal rights.
A nude photo leak is humiliating and rape and death threats are terrifying. I truly don’t understand what is so threatening about equal rights that leads people to behave this way. But, I feel, in part, it comes down to not listening, whether that refusal to listen stems from a fear that men might actually lose rights or whether it stems from a fear that people might realize that they actually haven’t treated women very well, I don’t really know. But, everyday I see evidence that people aren’t listening, such as this blog post discussing how exhausting it is to constantly have to explain feminism. The author writes,
I’m tired of men who insert themselves into feminist spaces with claims of hurt feelings. I’m tired of men who somehow manage to make every issue about them. I’m tired of men like the one who recently stopped by a friend’s Facebook thread in order to call feminism “cunty,” then lecture the women involved for being too “hostile” in their responses to him. I’m tired of men telling me that my understanding of feminism and rape culture are wrong, as if these aren’t things that I have studied intensely.
And, the very first comment is from a man telling her she is “probably wrong.” Way to listen, dude. How can we ever get anywhere if people won’t even listen to the actual goals and definition of feminism?
6 thoughts on “Feminism is Not a Bad Word”
You are aware the PR stunt was done by self-identifying feminist, right?
Also there’s a reason we are highly skeptical when Anita or Quinn speak of significant threats vs… say… Zelda Williams receiving harrassment. One side has a history of dishonesty and stands to financially gain from victimhood, while the other has no possible gain.
I don’t mind the #HeForShe thing so much, only that it maintains the tribal aspect of it. We should all look out for each other wherever injustice rears its head – not just men helping women. I know women who would scoff at a campaign like this.
Still, it’s leagues better than the cult-like ListenAndBelieve thing. How creepy is that!
I think it might be more accurate to just say it was trolls upon trolls. Trolls all the way down, as someone on Reddit put it. Who knows if these dudes actually support anything other than themselves — that’s all anyone’s really been able to figure out about them so far. Well, that and the shady YouTube business.
No, they were self identifying feminists. It’s a registered company and they did it partly to shut down 4chan – as many news outlets reported it as a 4chan threat and they didn’t have the decency to correct anyone about it. This isn’t speculation.
But yeah I’ll agree it’s still troll behavior, ironically so.
The early reports stated it was a registered company. Newer reports indicated that it does not exist but is instead affiliated with a group known for internet pranks and inflated YouTube views, as of two days ago. If there has been another development, please point me to it; I’d love to see the latest.
Oh boy, one of those things. I’ll triple check the absolute latest and perhaps there’s something between both our observations. Be back later.
Silly internet.
Oh yeah it seems to be a major hoax. Currently the official site is “hacked” while there is no proof that they were ever a company. You’re correct.
I do have a theory that was still slightly purposed to kill 4chan, probably by moot himself, but I would be riffing at that point.